There is a peculiar quality to mornings in Erbil. The dawn does not break dramatically here. It arrives quietly, cautiously—as though the city itself is listening before it speaks. Until recently, the distant mechanical hum of drones slicing through the pale desert sky had become an unsettling part of life in Erbil. At first, the sound disturbed your sleep. Later, it folded itself into the city’s uneasy rhythm, alongside the call to prayer, the barking of stray dogs, and the first taxi sputtering to life on a calm avenue.
But since the ceasefire was declared, the skies have grown quieter. The drones are gone, at least for now, and in that silence the city seems to breathe a little easier. Morning returns not with fear, but with the familiar sounds of shutters rising, tea glasses clinking, and streets slowly filling with life again.
And perhaps that is the greatest lesson Iraq teaches you: routine itself becomes an act of defiance.
But lately, the tension hanging over the Iran frontier feels heavier than usual. The geopolitical tremors between the United States and Iran no longer remain confined to military briefings or diplomatic corridors. They travel invisibly through oil tankers, financial markets, undersea cables, and remittance channels—eventually settling quietly into the everyday life of an ordinary Indian family thousands of kilometres away.
The escalation of conflict between the United States and Iran has sent an economic shockwave across the globe. For India, a nation tied to this region by threads of oil, migration, and millennia of history, the cost of war is never just a headline. It is a tangible, heavy burden.
The Unseen Threads of Interdependence
When the drums of war beat louder between Washington and Tehran, the immediate casualty is always the global energy market. The Strait of Hormuz—that narrow, vital chokepoint through which a third of the world’s liquefied natural gas and a quarter of its total oil consumption pass—suddenly feels like a tight noose.
For India, the stakes are immense. India imports the overwhelming majority of its crude oil requirements. So, when conflict threatens shipping routes in the Gulf, the consequences ripple rapidly through the Indian economy—not in dramatic explosions, but in slow, relentless increments.
For India, which imports over 80% of its crude oil, a spike in global oil prices is not an abstract statistical metric. It behaves like a slow-burning fever in the domestic economy.
The Diaspora’s Anxiety: Millions of Indians live and work in the Gulf region. They are the backbone of a vast remittance network that pours billions of dollars back into states like Kerala, Punjab, and Andhra Pradesh. When the region becomes a powder keg, it is not just their livelihoods at stake but the financial security of the families they left behind. For many families, the Gulf is not “abroad.” It is family.
The Cascading Cost: As oil prices soar, the price of transporting everyday goods rises. The tomatoes in the local mandi, the medicine at the pharmacy, and the public bus fare all begin to creep upward.
The Fragile Rupee: A widening current account deficit puts immense pressure on the Indian Rupee. As the currency weakens, importing essential technology and fertilizers becomes more expensive, squeezing the margins of both corporations and small-scale farmers.
Older Than Oil: A Perspective Carved in Clay & Commerce
To truly understand India’s vulnerability—and its deep anxiety over a US-Iran conflict—one must look past the modern stock tickers and gaze into the deeper well of history. The relationship between the Indian subcontinent and the Persian world was not forged by modern oil cartels; it was written on clay tablets and carried across monsoon-driven trade winds.
Centuries ago, the Sasanian Empire and the kingdoms of India exchanged more than just spices, silks, and indigo; they traded philosophies, mathematical concepts, and architectural languages. Persian influence later flowed into the courts of medieval India so deeply that Persian became the language of administration, literature, and diplomacy across large parts of the subcontinent.
Even today, echoes of that civilizational exchange survive everywhere. In the Urdu poetry recited in Delhi. In Mughal aesthetics. In Kashmiri carpets. In Lucknow’s etiquette. In the cardamom-heavy tea served in old bazaars from Baghdad to Hyderabad.
Standing beneath the great arch of Taq Kasra near Baghdad—the enormous brick vault built during the Sasanian era—you cannot help but feel that history here is never truly dead. It lingers in stone, dust, and language.

During the colonial period, the British Empire further bound India’s strategic destiny to the Gulf. Indian soldiers fought in Mesopotamia. Indian resources powered imperial campaigns across Persia and West Asia. The region’s security became inseparable from India’s economic future.
And in modern times, this connection evolved into energy corridors and strategic infrastructure.
In the modern landscape, Iran’s Chabahar Port was envisioned by India as a golden gateway to bypass hostile terrain and access Central Asia and Russia. A full-scale war or crippling long-term sanctions don’t just disrupt oil shipping lanes; they systematically dismantle decades of diplomatic architecture and infrastructure investment designed to reconnect India with the old Silk Road.
Any prolonged conflict or sweeping sanctions regime threatens not just oil shipments, but decades of painstaking diplomatic architecture.
Tea Beneath the Citadel
Sitting in a traditional tea house, Machko Chai Khana, beneath the ancient Erbil Citadel, sipping fragrant tea heavy with cardamom, you realise that history is a circle. The same dust that settled on the armies of antiquity now settles on the concrete blast walls of modern conflict.


Above us, history towered silently in layers—Assyrian, Persian, Ottoman, British, Iraqi, Kurdish. Civilisations had risen and collapsed on this same soil countless times before. And yet the tea kept pouring.
India finds itself walking a precarious diplomatic tightrope. It must maintain its strategic partnership with Washington while preserving its deep-rooted, historical energy and cultural ties with Tehran. It is a delicate balancing act between the immediate demands of modern global finance and the enduring ties of geography and heritage.
The economic crisis triggered by this confrontation is a sobering reminder that in our deeply interconnected world, an explosion in the Middle East fractures the peace of a household thousands of miles away. As the wheels of global politics grind on, one can only hope that the voices of resilience—the shopkeepers opening their doors in Erbil, the street vendors lighting their stoves in Mumbai—will outlast the ambitions of those who write their histories in gunpowder and oil. These are the people who absorb the true cost of geopolitical confrontation.
As global powers posture across deserts and seas, ordinary people continue doing what humanity has always done in difficult times: opening shops, pouring tea, lighting stoves, balancing household budgets, and hoping tomorrow arrives a little quieter than today.
And perhaps that quiet persistence—not missiles, not oil, not empires—is what ultimately holds the world together.

Aptly concluded. The resistance of the little guy holds the key to peace returning. The whole world has been at this point time and time again. And, unfortunately, will continue to be held hostage by regimes, egos, leaders and other desperate and sick people.